Close Panel




Cattle Subject Verb Agreement

By Erik. Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

But when the pronoun “who” is used, grammar rules that the subsidiary sentence (and all verbs incorporated in it) always refers to the immediate precursor noun, which is “cows” and not “herd” (main accessory). Thus, we use “belong” instead of “belongs” and “are grazing” instead of “is grazing”. 17. When the verb predicate precedes a number of subjects, it is often in the singular, especially when the sentence begins here or there. 2. A herd of cows suffering from the disease was slaughtered. (There is no pronoun here and all verbs here refer to the main “herd”) a) Some of them still have a singular form and adopt a singular verb: aristocracy, bourgeoisie, peasantry, furniture, machines, linen. But if we use a singular noun that can be thought of either as an integer unit or as a collection of individuals, we can use a singular or plural verblage. 1. A herd of cows infected with the disease was slaughtered (“cows” is the precursor of “welche welche” and all subsequent verbs refer to cows). The noun “Wasps” is plural and therefore requires a plural verblage. If the last element is the singular and the previous element is plural, we can use a singular or plural. 15.

If a singular and a plural subject with “soit. or” or “ni”. Nor”, place the plural compartment in the last position, then use a plural platelet. Example: either she or the others (have, must) come. Answer: You have two. If a countable noun follows an indefinite pronoun, use a plural example: – all beans (are, are) well cooked. Answer: – All potholes (were, were) completely filled with water. Answer: Sometimes the verb is plural because the collective noun refers to the individuals in the group, not the group as a whole. Is it because the main noun “group” is considered more important than the plural noun of “soldiers”? If your answer is “yes”, can I say that the statement/sentence is correct when using plural verblage, since I can always say that the plural noun “soldiers” is more important than the main noun of “group”? – Ee Na I refer to paul Chan`s following sentence for MOE, January 6: “We have a series of six articles that give a good description of the listed building.” I have taken note of your statement that a plural verbage should be used, as the plural noun is considered a more important precursor than the principal noun (“series”) of the substantive sentence. If we use a plural noun after “many of”, the verb is also plural. After re-reading Paul`s initial question and my answer, reflecting and reading more deeply the questions raised, I have come to the conclusion that the relevant point to be taken into account in such sentences is not whether the verb should correspond to the principal noun or the precursor noun, but whether a collective noun in a participatory structure should use a singular or plural verb. These nouns in singular form can take either a singular verblage or a plural verblage.

We use singular verbling when we consider the institution or organization as a unit, a collective body. If “Tas” refers to a group as a whole (i.e. as a thing), it is singular, so the verb is singular. 19. Collective nouns (such as class, herd, Senate, or crowd) usually adopt singular verbs. Example: the herd (was, was) trampling. Answer: it was. 5. After percent (also percent and %) we use a singular verb.

10. For constructions that contain “one of them. Who.. The plural references use the example: I am one of the people who are (are, are) well informed on the subject. Answer: But if “a heap” means “a lot,” it`s plural, so the verb is also plural…

Email this author | All posts by | Subscribe to Entries (RSS)


» Comments are closed.